Estimated losses of innovative capacity of the parties as a result of «hybrid» Russian aggression against Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.142081

Keywords:

innovative potential, production function, macroeconomic dynamics, «hybrid» aggression, GDP in real prices

Abstract

The object of the research is the process of estimation of losses of the innovation potential of the states that are in «hybrid» military confrontation. But there appears a problem of trustworthiness of results of such estimation. It may be achieved by comparing deviations of the real dynamics of national production results taking into account factors of the physical and human capital and also technological progress.

The work conducts the estimation of losses (increment) of the innovative potential of Ukraine as a state-victim and Russia as a state-aggressor in the «hybrid» war, started from the temporary occupation of the Crimean Autonomous republic and continuing till today. Estimation results are based on real (official) statistical data of the World Bank, present in public access for 1995–2017. The estimation object is the dynamics of result of the national economies of the conflict parties taking into account production factors and technological progress.

There was realized the improvement of the methodical support of the estimation of innovation potential losses at the microlevel by modeling the production function of Tinbergen-Solow. As a result there was obtained the fixed and current dynamics of the technological progress parameter for the states-antagonists in the «hybrid» conflict for 2013–2017. There were calculated differences of multipliers of Tinbergen-Solow production function by the technological progress parameter – fixed for 2013 and current for 2014–2017.

It was grounded that during 4 years of «hybrid» aggression renovation of the Ukrainian national economy is by 7,5 % slower than in Russia. The increment of the Ukrainian innovation potential in 2014–2017 was 2,1 % of the GDP volume for the end of 2013. Losses of the Russian innovative potential for the same period were 8,5 % of the GDP volume for 2013.

The results of improving the methodical support of the process of estimating innovation potential losses of the parties of «hybrid» aggression form a base for modeling the dynamics of real GDP and its physical volume that increases a base of future studies essentially.

Author Biographies

Nataliia Biloshkurska, Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University, 2, Sadova str., Uman, Cherkassy region, Ukraine, 20300

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Marketing, Management and Business Management

Mykola Biloshkurskyi, Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University, 2, Sadova str., Uman, Cherkassy region, Ukraine, 20300

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Finance, Accounting and Economic Security

Hanna Chyrva, Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University, 2, Sadova str., Uman, Cherkassy region, Ukraine, 20300

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economics and Social-Behavioral Sciences

References

  1. Horbulin, V. (2017). The World Hybrid War: Ukrainian Forefront. Kharkiv: Folio, 158.
  2. Vlasiuk, O. S., Kononenko, S. V. (2017). Kremlivska ahresiia proty Ukrainy: rozdumy v konteksti viiny. Kyiv: NISD, 304.
  3. Sobkevych, O. V., Shevchenko, A. V., Mykhailychenko, K. M., Rusan, V. M., Bielashov, Ye. V. et. al. (2017). Realnyi sektor ekonomiky Ukrainy: priorytety rozvytku v umovakh zminy vektora ekonomichnoi polityky: analit. dop. Kyiv: NISD, 40.
  4. Dodonov, R. O. (Ed.) (2017). Hibrydna viina: in verbo et in praxi. Vinnytsia: TOV «NilanLTD», 412.
  5. Horbulin, V. P., Vlasiuk, O. S., Libanova, E. M., Liashenko, O. M. (Eds.) (2015). Donbas i Krym: tsina povernennia. Kyiv: NISD, 474.
  6. Antonenko, A., Bambals, R., Berzins, J., Bond, I., Cepuritis, M., Dobrokhotov, R. et. al. (2015). The War in Ukraine: Lessons for Europe. Riga, 182.
  7. Banasik, M. (2016). Russia’s Hybrid War in Theory and Practice. Journal on Baltic Security, 2 (1), 157–182. doi: http://doi.org/10.1515/jobs-2016-0035
  8. Wither, J. K. (2016). Making Sense of Hybrid Warfare. Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 15 (2), 73–87. doi: http://doi.org/10.11610/connections.15.2.06
  9. Thomas, T. (2015). Russia’s Military Strategy and Ukraine: Indirect, Asymmetric – and Putin-Led. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 28 (3), 445–461. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2015.1061819
  10. Thiele, R. D. (2015). Crisis in Ukraine – the emergence of hybrid warfare. ISPSW Strategy Series: Focus on Defense and International Security, 347, 1–13.
  11. Charap, S. (2015). The Ghost of Hybrid War. Survival, 57 (6), 51–58. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2015.1116147
  12. Renz, B. (2016). Russia and “hybrid warfare.” Contemporary Politics, 22 (3) Russia, the West, and the Ukraine Crisis, 283–300. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2016.1201316
  13. Petro, N. N. (2016). Ukraine in crisis. European Politics and Society, 17 (4), 421–423. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2016.1154128
  14. Gardner, H. (2016). The Russian annexation of Crimea: regional and global ramifications. European Politics and Society, 17 (4), 490–505. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2016.1154190
  15. Kuzio, T. (2016). Ukraine between a Constrained EU and Assertive Russia. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55 (1) Special Issue: Europe’s Hybrid Foreign Policy: The Ukraine-Russia Crisis, 103–120. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12447
  16. Biloshkurskyi, M. V.; Shaposhnykov, K. S. et. al. (Eds.) (2013). Do problemy ekonomichnoi diahnostyky stanu rozvytku innovatsiinoi diialnosti pidpryiemstv. Sotsialno-ekonomichni transformatsii v umovakh hlobalizatsii: svitovyi ta vitchyznianyi vymiry. Kherson: Vydavnychyi dim «Helvetyka», 56–58.
  17. Lysenko, N. O., Biloshkurska, N. V. (2012). Zastosuvannia vyrobnychoi funktsii Tinbergena pry analizi innovatsiinoi skladovoi ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstv APK. Innovatsiina ekonomika, 4 (30), 140–144.
  18. Biloshkurska, N. V., Biloshkurskyi, M. V., Omelyanenko, V. A. (2018). Evaluation of Ukrainian industry innovative development with a technological progress parameter. Scientific Bulletin of Polissia, 2 (1 (13)), 23–28. doi: http://doi.org/10.25140/2410-9576-2018-2-1(13)-23-28
  19. Tinbergen, J. (1942). Zur Theorie der Langfristigen Wirtschaftsentwicklung. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 55, 511–549.
  20. Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39 (3), 312–320. doi: http://doi.org/10.2307/1926047
  21. Moroney, J. R., Ferguson, C. E. (1970). Efficient Estimation of Neoclassical Parameters of Substitution and Biased Technological Progress. Southern Economic Journal, 37 (2), 125–131. doi: http://doi.org/10.2307/1056121
  22. Biloshkurska, N. V., Biloshkurskyi, M. V. (2015). Prohnozuvannia rozvytku promyslovoho vyrobnytstva Ukrainy z urakhuvanniam vplyvu tekhnolohichnoho prohresu. Priorytety rozvytku natsionalnoi ekonomiky Ukrainy: stratehiia i perspektyvy. Uman: VPTs «Vizavi», 6–8.
  23. Tinbergen, J. (1973). Exhaustion and technological development: A macro-dynamic policy model. Zeitschrift Für Nationalökonomie, 33 (3-4), 213–234. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/bf01283657
  24. Solow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70 (1), 65–94. doi: http://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
  25. Cobb, C. B., Douglas, P. H. (1928). A theory of production. The American Economic Review, 18 (1), 139–165.
  26. Biloshkurska, N. V. (2015). Management of industrial production in Ukraine: innovative aspect. Ekonomichnyi prostir, 98, 54–63.
  27. Free and open access to global development data. World Bank Open Data. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org

Downloads

Published

2018-04-24

How to Cite

Biloshkurska, N., Biloshkurskyi, M., & Chyrva, H. (2018). Estimated losses of innovative capacity of the parties as a result of «hybrid» Russian aggression against Ukraine. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(5(42), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.142081

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 5(42) (2018): Macroeconomics

Section

Problems of Macroeconomics and Socio-Economic Development: Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Nataliia Biloshkurska, Mykola Biloshkurskyi, Hanna Chyrva

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.